Report ID: 316

Report Overview

Two construction firms were sentenced in 2012 after a crane collapsed onto a city centre apartment block resulting in the crane driver being paralysed from the waist. The 80-metre-high tower crane was being used as part of a multi-million pound project to build a new eight-storey hotel and seven apartment blocks when it overturned. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecuted the site's principal contractor and the structural engineering company following an investigation into the incident. Eight counterweights on the crane, weighing a total of 56 tonnes, broke free and crashed through the roof and six floors of a adjacent building.

Report Content

Two construction firms were sentenced in 2012 after a crane collapsed onto a city centre apartment block in 2009 resulting in the crane driver being paralysed from the waist. The 80-metre-high tower crane was being used as part of a multi-million pound project to build a new eight-storey hotel and seven apartment blocks when it overturned. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecuted the site's principal contractor and the structural engineering company following an investigation into the incident. Eight counterweights on the crane, weighing a total of 56 tonnes, broke free and crashed through the roof and six floors of a adjacent building. The crane driver fell from his cab onto the roof of the apartments and through the hole created by the counterweights. He suffered multiple injuries including a brain haemorrhage, fractured skull, broken right shoulder, broken ribs, crush injuries to his left side, and major spinal injuries which resulted in his legs being paralysed. No one inside the building was injured but residents had to be evacuated from the 64 apartments, and some were rescued from their balconies. The damage to the building was extensive and residents were unable to return to their homes for nearly two years while major reconstruction work took place.

The HSE investigation into the incident found that the crane's foundation could not cope with the forces generated by the crane. During the construction of the foundation, both the contractor and designer agreed to cut away essential steel reinforcement bars from the four concrete foundation piles, so that the crane's feet could sit on top on them. These were replaced with up to 5 steel rods in each pile. This action reduced the forces the foundation could withstand. Summing up in court, the Judge said he was satisfied that it was the removal of the reinforcing steel and the inadequate replacement of the steel rods that led to the foundation being overloaded and the crane collapsing. Both companies were found guilty of breaches of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 by failing to ensure the safety of workers or residents. The contractor was fined £280,000. The design firm has ceased trading since the crane collapse after going into voluntary liquidation. The company was fined a nominal £1,000. Speaking after the hearing, the investigating inspector at HSE said: "Serious failings on the parts of both the contractor and the designer were uncovered by the Health and Safety Executive during an extensive and complex investigation into the crane collapse. Whilst it is bad enough that the crane driver will be unable to walk for the rest of his life as a result of the failings of both parties, it is no exaggeration to say it was only by pure chance that this catastrophic event did not result in multiple fatalities and significantly more damage to property.”

"The employees of the design firm had no previous experience of designing the type of crane foundation used on the project. Likewisethe contractor’s employees had no experience of building one. Both parties made disastrous errors that were entirely preventable. The original error was made by the designer, which failed to spot a basic mistake in its calculations for the loadings imposed by the crane. This created a material risk which had the potential to have led to a crane foundation being constructed that was not strong enough to hold the crane up. During construction of the foundation the designer advised the contractor to cut away essential steel reinforcing bars in the foundation piles and replace such with (alternative) steel rods. The removal of such reinforcing steel, resulted in the foundation being too weak to support the crane. The foundation was further weakened when the contractor failed to ensure the adequate insertion of the replacing steel rods. Neither Company did enough to check what the result would be of cutting away this essential steel reinforcement and replacing such with (alternative) steel rods." "HSE hopes this case sends a clear message to the construction industry in relation to tower crane foundations. Designers of such should be familiar with industry accepted guidance and follow it, unless they have extremely well thought-out reasons for not doing so. The role of the Principal Contractor is also crucial in managing the design process. Both Principal Contractors and Designers should ensure that robust systems for design checking are actioned at all times. Information on crane safety is available at www.hse.gov.uk/construction.

Comments